While reading that hilariousness, the most appropriate advertisement popped up in the middle of the article.
Just about pissed myself at how fitting it was.
So it starts out by saying that the Oilers need more defense depth, but that they're also okay (well alright then!). His argument for the Oilers not needing Hamonic is because Russell brings everything he does, and I guess you can only have so much shot blocking on one defense. Also says that "trusting" a 23 year old sophomore straight out of the NCAA to step into a top 4 position in Sekera's absence is a better option, because... actually there isn't really an explanation. Because it's good for his confidence? I think. Also stuff about Larsson being a great acquisition even though it has nothing to do with the #4 spot. Just pointless boasting about a trade that they lost. A++ article. Would read again.