Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpy-Gunt
My question is if he is worth getting when we had stone as a 4. Is the 1st and 2 2nds worth it for the improvement of Hamonic over Stone. Looking at it like that it makes no sense.
Re sign stone or acquire a marginally better player for a 3 top 60 picks.
That really makes me think we are signing stone as well as this hamonic trade. Makes a bit of sense tbh. Engelland gone. Replaced with stone. Hamonic in at 4.
I think we can have both of them and still find scoring depth.
|
I'd do Harmonic over Stone everyday of the week and that's no insult to Stone.
Harmonic has shown that he can play over 20 minutes a night consistently so if there are injuries to Gio or Brodie he can step in, I can't say the same about Stone. On top of that Harmonic does the nasty work that Stone doesn't do. He also does it cheaper, also he's hitting prime defensemen years.
Yeah without hesitation, as far as the draft picks go, I'm ok with this if it signals that we're at the end of the rebuild and getting serious about competing.