Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus
So the Flames suddenly have 5 blue chip prospects in their system?
Any one of these players could easily not make the NHL for a variety of reasons just as easily as they could flourish. That in itself, disqualifies them from being blue chip.
|
Whatever man. I guess we have to define each word before we use it?
Almost every prospect has a chance of busting so I guess there's only a couple bluechip prospects drafted each year according to your definition?
How many prospects on Button's list that I linked above would you consider bluechip? If I used the word top prospect instead of bluechip would that suddenly make things okay?
Not even sure what we're really arguing about now. I think that Jankowski has good trade value if teams have scouted him. I think Parsons obviously has good trade value. I think Gillies has good trade value. I think Andersson, Fox and Kylington all have some trade value. They are assets.