Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi
I'm thinking about it less from the perspective of what happened to other teams and more from the perspective of the relative pain from losing any one player.
Kulak is the best Flames asset that was expansion eligible. That's why it hurts. If Chiasson, Bouma, Shinkaruk, Brouwer, or whomever else was taken it's be better than losing Kulak.
So be it. Ultimately the proof is in the pudding, if McPhee takes Kulak then he agrees that Kulak was the best player available.
|
Heck I agree he is the best player available. Still doesn't justify your pain ramblings.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|