View Single Post
Old 06-15-2017, 03:24 PM   #12
ernie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by btimbit View Post
Then let him walk, this guy is about as replaceable as you can get
Absolutely. That is my preference as well. But that was never in the cards. Canuck fans were hoping for the lesser of two evils (1 year vs multi-year) and this is it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oil Stain
You really think Benning was the one asking for one year of term?

I think this is Gudbranson trying to escape Vancouver.

Do you think the Canucks will get a 1st, 2nd, and 4th for him at the deadline to recoup their payment for him?
I think Gudbranson would be silly not to be asking for a multi-year deal given the quality of player he is (i.e. not great). I don't believe he was the one asking for a one-year deal. I also don't really think Benning was either. I think more likely it was similar to last year with Florida that there wasn't likely a ton of common ground for multi-year so they signed a one year deal.

I think the canucks will get very little for him. He isn't very good. It was a terrible trade.
ernie is offline   Reply With Quote