Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra
If Vegas needs to be enticed to take Brouwer, why wouldn't they just select Kulak without Brouwer attached to him?
If taking Brouwer requires enticing, Calgary will need to attach more than an available player to him.
There will likely be less enticing players available with as much as 1st round picks attached to them to ensure movement. I doubt that Vegas will be enticed by a potential 6-7 d-man to take on a contract they don't want.
|
If LV is 'ok' taking Brouwer due to GMGM history but can get two players free instead of one they might do it