Well if it's just the upskirt thing that actually violates the code provision I think I'm cool with that being voyeurism even if you're not using a camera, really. Not to mention that I suspect if they have terabytes of pictures and videos, some of them are going to be much worse than just that and no doubt actually do capture unsuspecting women at home or in changing rooms or whatever. I'm just saying that I don't think whoever drafted that provision was intending to criminalize checking out someone's assets on the street.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
|