Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
Republicans should be defending the shooter. He used his right to bear arms for the purpose it was intended... to resist tyrannical government.
Working as intended.... no?
|
Could this work in court?
You could say that the 2nd amendment compelled you to act. It would lead to civil war if you won but is there a legal argument to me made that taking up arms against the government is constitutionally protected?