Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
I think so much more could be gleaned here simply by creating a proper visual timeline with known discoveries in proper order. For example:
On January 26th, Sally Yates was so worried about the false information Pence was telling the American people about Mike Flynn's communication with the ambassador, that she went directly to White House Counsel Donald McGahn's office. She told him "unambiguously" that Flynn had been compromised by the Russians and they knew this.
The very next day, Trump invited Comey over to the White House for dinner and told Comey he "hoped you can see your way to clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go"
That's quite striking when viewed in context of the timeline IMO
|
I agree with your assessment of how it looks, and I'm sure all this is being considered by everyone working on the case. The only issue is that there isn't anything concrete enough to make an irrefutable direct connection to Trump.