Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyFlame
The countries have stated they oppose the Baker plan --An outright LIE and beyond stupid. Bush hasn't received the Baker plan --How dense are you?
It's a regional problem --Yeah sure Lanny and the Americans aren't part of the problem or won't be part of the solution. Like they weren't in the Balkans I suppose.
You would make a brillant politician. I can see your first interview. Ahhh that idiot Obama and that dufus Holbrooke along with that bozo Baker and his think tank should just leave the decision on whether American troops leave IRAQ to the Syrians and the Iraquis. You would be laughed off Capitol Hill and dismissed as an idiot by every American politician from every political persuasion alive in the country.
Facts :
1. Countries have never said zilch about the Baker plan.
2. Bush has never had the Baker plan presented to him.
3. Americans will be making up their own minds about American troops.
Your rubbish that there is known opposition to the Baker plan is of course unfactual and unprovable as it dosen't exist. Your knowledge that Bush is against the Baker plan is as per usual unfactual and unprovable. Your idea that Americans will give the decision over what to do with American troops and policy over to the Iranians and Syrians is not only unfactual and unprovable but ridiculous.
Meanwhile that the Baker plan was called for by Congress --FACT.
That it has bi-partisan support with a growing number of movers and skakers on board --FACT.
Face it. You have nothing but BS to offer. You can't offer a single substantiated fact about the Baker plan. NOT ONE!!!!
|
So you think Bush doesn't know what the Baker plan is? I mean I find it hard to believe that all these other people know about it including you and Bush hasn't seen anything about it. The fact is you raise this plan as some huge savior of a plan that will knockdown any obstacles and can permeate to please everyone. Let me let you in on something there's going to be a lot of opposition in the Middle East. It's great that everyone in the US gov't is getting along about this plan, but they aren't the ones that really matter. Btw, from the few articles I've read the say this "loose federation" plan is closer to the deal struck in Yugoslavia in 1990 then the Dayton Accord, you know the one that sent the country into civil war?