Quote:
Originally Posted by DiracSpike
How about how most of the owners could sell for 10X their original investment and not have to deal with this anymore.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiracSpike
It has worth because it's a 1/31 share of the NHL. They're not losing money hand over fist but they could decide to forego all the headaches that come with owning a team and realize their tidy capital appreciations. I won't fault them for that, any of us would do the same.
|
Owning a hockey team really is an onerous task. Headaches? Seriously? Wake me up when they're losing money. They have the privilege of owning one of the scarcest properties out there. If that makes life too hard, then good riddance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV
Having seen the storied Seattle Supersonics become the Oklahoma City Thunder, I don't think it's crazy to think the Flames could move without a new Arena. However I'm confident an arena deal will get done so it's a moot point.
|
How has that worked out? IIRC the new buyers were OKC folks. How does the franchise valuation and operating revenue compare now? We'll really find out how good that decision is once they lose Westbrook and recede to the basement of the standings.
From the FlamesNation interview:
This is a big thing for me that I hope is scrutinized as things move forward.