Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC
The ability to spread religious extremism that advocates killing people is pretty low on my list of things worth preserving... even for "near zero" impact.
|
I have a pretty narrow definition of what constitutes dangerous speech. However, I feel no allowances whatsoever should be made for the speech having a religious inspiration. I see no difference between a political party that says Jews are parasitic subhumans, and a religious movement that says people who insult their deity deserve to die.