Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis
No comments about Halep being down 3-6, 1-5 and rallying to win? She's been such a headcase the last few years I would have given 1000-1 on her coming back from that. Amazing rally for her, and sets up her against Pliskova for the (likely) #1 ranking in the SF. There's a scenario where Kerber actually retains it, but I think we'd all like to not see that.
As far as the men goes, as long as we avoid a Murray-Nadal final I think thats good. Thiem-Wawrinka would be a lot of fun, two guys who can hammer it on clay, would be lots of big winners in that one. I suspect it's Stan and Rafa though, which would also be good albeit more as a contrast in styles than anything.
|
As a casual follower of the sport at this point, I appreciate your commentary. So, please tell me why Kerber being #1 is bad. Also, I get the impression that Murray is a giant d-bag - is that so?