Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random
That makes no sense at all. What you are saying is that Pittsburgh will do one of two things:
(a) Trade Fleury, but only for such assets as will 100% compensate for any other player lost in the expansion draft;
(b) Lose MURRAY in the expansion draft and do nothing about it.
Normally, in dealing with a projected loss of assets, you consider options other than total mitigation and no mitigation at all. It's better to cut your losses than just sit and take them, even if you can't cut your losses all the way to zero.
If the market dictates that you can't cut the losses to zero, logic dictates that you do the best you can. You appear to advocate that the Penguins should just take it on the chin if they can't find a perfect deal.
|
If they don't do something with fluery then they lose Murray or have to make a deal with the LGK to give them an asset to pick someone else
A)trade Fleury and get something
B) Don't trade him lose Murray
c) Trade prospect/picks to have them pick one of their D etc.