Quote:
Originally Posted by Reaper
So? Attack the argument; break down the flaws in the logic, and illustrate why you think he's wrong. But your delicious outrage makes you throw that away because you want to try out your new pitchfork and you're right back to name calling.
|
I get that Reaper. But
my argument is that anyone who believes a legitimate relationship can occur between a middle aged teacher and his underage student is a sick perverted person. So now do you disagree with my argument?
How many rape victims out there haven't come forward because they "didn't say no" or "they didn't know it was wrong" at the time. Or afraid they will be stigmatized because "they were asking for it." When someone dismisses sexual assault by suggesting it was a "legitimate relationship between people who genuinely love each other" while one of those persons was an underage child, it's a disgusting attitude to have. Especially when the victim has shown the courage to come forward to the police.
Hell, Cecil actually suggested this:
Quote:
For all we know this girl's family found out and pressured her to come forward against her will.
|
Sorry, I won't apologize for attacking a rapist apologist.