Quote:
Originally Posted by Itse
I don't see how you go from that to "the player you're describing wouldn't have made it above the 4th line". As I said, I'm not a big fan of his game in general, and don't see a big future. That doesn't mean I think he sucks.
|
This is what you said, "Most nights he's pretty much just filler. Not good enough defensively for a shutdown role, doesn't put up enough points for an offensive role, not consistent enough to be a really good energy player. Not bad enough to stand out, but not actually helping you win."
You said he's not good enough for a shutdown role, not good enough for an offensive role, not a good energy player, doesn't help you win. That pretty much says you think he sucks and shouldn't be on the team. Maybe you didn't realize how strongly worded your statement was there? Certainly it was false and clearly a lot of hyperbole. That is why I reacted strongly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Itse
I'm also having a bit of a hard time seeing why people get so angry if everybody doesn't LOVE Micheal Ferland.
|
I don't care if people don't love Ferland. But cut the BS about him not being good enough to be a defensive player, offensive player, energy player or help you win. Cause those statements were total utter BS. They make you look biased and that you hate him. Or that you weren't watching him. Cause really what you said there was indefensible. You were very careless with your words in that post. Pretty easy to see why people would disagree with that sentiment.