I really do believe people are still undervaluing Ferland here.
Think about it this way. Does the phrase: "Micheal Ferland the 20 goal scorer" seem like a pipe dream?
Ferland scored 15 goals this year, playing primarily low minutes in the bottom 6. Used primarily this season as an energy player.
If he starts on the top line, I think he can really build off of his goal totals. I would be surprised if a healthy Ferland playing on the top line, and (rightfully) pushing Brouwer off the PP, isn't a lock for scoring 20 goals. I think with his IQ and his shot, I would be surprised if he doesn't reach 30 goals (and yes, I am aware this is not the 1980's any longer) AT SOME POINT IN HIS CAREER, not necessarily this year or as a perennial scorer.
Ferland's hands are so underrated. The kid is a complete package of what you want in a power-forward, plus he gives you the added benefit of being completely trustworthy on the ice in not taking selfish penalties or even minors.
As for the whole 'Ferland is not a fast skater' or 'doesn't have a good first step or agility' - I think those are some of his strengths. If he had poor speed, acceleration AND agility (he is amazing at how agile he is given his thickness), he would sometimes be forced to hook and hold guys more. Because of his strong IQ and his overall speed, he not only rarely puts himself in poor positions, but he also has the physical tools to close gaps and recover well.
It is really fine to question exactly where Ferland ends up. However, he has basically all the tools he needs. I also disagree with the Kassian comment somewhat. I think Ferland is a better scorer AND a better playmaker. Kassian has soft hands for a big man too, and it isn't like he is unskilled at all, but that Ferland is really a full tier above Kassian. I guess we will see how they are relative to one another in time. I disagreed completely with Feaster telling Ferland that "he can be a Zack Kassian". I think he can be a heck of a lot better. I think he IS better.
|