Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
I hope this isn't taken as patronizing or anything, but I just want to point out how totally disarming this response is to my original question about whether you'd intentionally omitted relevant information. If anyone was looking for an example on here of a way to respond to a challenge to one's credibility that not only completely rehabilitates it, but actually increases it, this should be exhibit "A".
|
Not patronizing at all. Appreciate your kind words.
Believe it or not, this is not the first time that I've been wrong. When it happens (more frequently than I would like), I try to at least learn something from it.