View Single Post
Old 05-25-2017, 11:13 AM   #540
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Unless it is a franchise goalie with a lot of good years left in him the Flames should not even remotely entertain offers on Parsons.
Then it will be Gillies that gets moved. I think Flames fans should expect that one of the young goalies will get moved. It also makes a lot of sense in terms of development as you don't want any of Gillies/Rittich/Parsons in the ECHL where the Flames won't have control next year. And no, none of these 3 are ready to backup in the NHL next year.

The reality is the Flames won't need 3 lottery ball goalie prospects if they acquire a quality number 1 who will be around for at least a couple of years. 2 is sufficient and they still have another lottery ball in McDonald who could turn it around.

For a team like the Rangers and Capitals, trading a Raanta or Grubauer for a Gillies makes a lot of sense as they retain the young goalie asset rather than losing it to Vegas.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
868904 is offline   Reply With Quote