Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
Again, NHL.com has pretty much all this information. I'm not sure why this is hard to look up, so here you go:
Brian Elliott - 49 GP/18 below .890 = 38%
Chad Johnson - 36 GP/15 below .890 = 42%
Ben Bishop - 39 GP/14 below .890 = 36%
MAF - 38 GP/14 below .890 = 37%
So I guess the answer is all of them.
(And, actually I seem to have misread the number you gave. If you drop it down to .880 or lower, the only two that didn't spend 1/3 of the season or more at that dismal number are Elliott at 28% of his season and MAF at 31% of his season. Johnson and Bishop were both .880 or worse >33% of the season).
|
Just goes to show while Elliott wasn't nearly as bad as some people think he was as Johnson and Bishop were worse. I'm actually stunned some around here still think Johnson is better lol. I wouldn't object to trading for Pickard (I don't see the price being as high as some of the other backups that may or may not be available) and signing Elliott to a one year deal if he would accept that and seeing if either can take hold of the starting job. Johnson and Pickard doesn't make sense because we know Johnson can't seize the job and would have to hope Pickard could be good enough to start the majority if games.