Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackEleven
Agreed. To the same effect I posted the below, earlier:
A person who never believes in exceptions and blindly follows dogma without considering the particular situation is much more dangerous to a free society that a person who believes that rules can have exceptions. In fact there is a word for this: fundamentalist.
Were both people on the left side of the political specturm. The difference is I do not blindly follow what I think left-wing ideology preaches without evaluating a situation with common sense first.
|
BAH! Quit quoting him!!! AHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!
Again, if you want to discuss the topic, awesome. If you want to discuss me, get a life.
If you think I'm "blindly" following some sort of dogma, the only dogma I am "blindly" following is the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Making these cab-drivers go all the way to the back of the line, is inefficent, to say the very least. Why not make the lives of these drivers easier when it will not affect anyone but those who believe these people do not have the same rights as everyone else to practise their religion.
Have you ever been in a working situation where your morals have been tested? So, how much money are your morals worth to you exactly?
This is a good time to bring Agamemnon into the equation:
Originally Posted by
Agamemnon 
Hear hear, I'm pretty ultra-Liberal and I think its hogwash.
Here we have a self-proclaimed "ultra-Liberal". Has been quoted many a time to be a supporter of the green party. Yet, what does "ultra-Liberal" Agamemnon do for a living? Petroleum Land Administrator. Obviously, his morals are a lot cheaper than the Muslim cab-drivers.
Please, for love of God, stop quoting him.