Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
You're being obtuse.
It's press have an ethical obligation to regard what they're reporting beyond legal definitions.
You're the expert on classification in this thread for sure. In this case it's not really relevant because we aren't discussing legal ramifications here
|
Then what is being discussed here, because the press have an obligation to expose wrong doing in the government? I think they did a great job in holding back details and not disclosing all of the information they could have. I think they lived up to their "moral" obligations, especially when "their" obligation is to provide transparency and information. So please explain what I am missing here, because it seems like the demonization of the media is a handy dodge for the White House to use to make people look past a major #### up on the diplomatic and intelligence fronts.