Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
Well I can't speak for everyone, but I would be fine with not wanting two sides of downtown under construction at the same time.
If they wanted a catalyst for the contamination then away they went, but if they wouldn't support developing both at front it makes sense to me.
But otherwise I disagree, that area with or without a building needs roads, utilities, roads moved, probably with the Crowchild change some re working there. And none of that changes today with CalgaryNext effectively dead.
Those costs are West Village costs, not all CalgaryNext. Silly to sum it up as one and say they were wrong.
|
Thank you, I can not stand this cost differential argument and how flames were "lying".
Lets compare apples to Oranges and try to argue they are the same.