Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyB
Hillary was a candidate that didn't fit the desires of the electorate and still doesn't fit the direction the electorate is moving. Saying it was obvious she had the better chance of winning and should have done so without difficulty just reflects analysis that missed out a lot of important factors and didn't really understand what was going on with voters. Seems similar to how plenty of analysis said Trump had no chance of winning the nomination and was going to get crushed in the general. Totally off the mark.
|
So, I find this analysis interesting.
I think it is very basic, an angry, gullible and possibly, not so bright, voter base fell for a mentally unstable, narcissistic, liars lies.
Hills offered retraining for unemployed coal miners, Trump promised to bring back coal jobs
But maybe you can describe the missed analysis and which part of the voters was misunderstood.
Also, which direction is the electorate moving?