Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
I haven't really watched Mike Smith (you couldn't pay me to care about Arizona) but he's looked okay against the Flames and has some all-star appearances under his belt. People seem to have pretty strong opinions one way or another on him, so what's the take?
If yes to Smith, why?
If no, why not?
|
I could go either way on Smith. He is an above average consistent veteran but is getting older, is injury prone, and is overpaid. He is great at handling the puck but also great at horrible giveaways. He had one incredible season in 2011/12 dragging the Yotes to the WCF but hasn't been able to equal that play since.
If the Flames decide to go for the veteran route he would be an upgrade on Elliott but a second choice to MAF.