Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
I don't get it. He provides stability in net right NOW and probably for at LEAST 4 years of that deal. Way better than what we've got going on right now.
Stars 2017/18 - High probability of stability
Stars 2018/19 - High probability of stability
Stars 2019/20 - High probability of stability
Stars 2020/21 - High probability of stability
Stars 2021/22 - Starting to question as he's now 35 (So are Rinne, Andersen and Lundqvist)
Stars 2022/23 - Maybe it's now finally falling apart he's 36 (So was Luongo when he was up for Vezina last year)
Flames 2017/18 - ??????????????????????
Flames 2018/19 - ??????????????????????
Flames 2019/20 - ??????????????????????
Flames 2020/21 - ??????????????????????
Flames 2021/22 - ??????????????????????
Flames 2022/23 - ??????????????????????
Yeah, I'd rather roll the dice with what the Stars just got thanks.
Hopefully that changes over the next few months, but I doubt whatever we end up getting will be able to provide the stability Bishop will likely provide for Dallas in the coming years.
|
Yes, anyone in their right mind would prefer something over ??????????????????????
But I am confident in what Treliving will bring in as our last line of defence in the offseason. But everyone is all up in arms "Why didnt we get Bishop if the Stars got him for a 4th rounder" Like i said in my last post...Maybe he didn't want to come to Calgary?