Quote:
Originally Posted by Robo
that's why our goal was so controversial because no interference call was made until they looked at it to see it went in the net before it was knocked off. then the ref just said it was goalie interference
|
Yeah the call on the ice was simply no goal so they reviewed to see if the puck crossed the line. After the review their explanation was that the puck did cross the line but the call on the ice was goaltender interference and no goal. The problem is that if you look at the replay over and over neither official ever motioned that it was goaltender interference prior to going to replay. It's like they were make my things up on the fly.