Quote:
Originally Posted by FireGilbert
I think the first review was just to see if the puck went in before the net came off. After it was called a goal Washington could then challenge interference. It looks really bad however that first of all the refs didn't call the obvious interference and second it was reviewed twice with two different results.
It's confusing though because of the Flames disallowed goal against the Ducks where they did call it goalie interference during the review so there was no point in the Flames challenging.
|
Exactly, I'm fuming because they automatically called ours interference when it was actually very questionable. This was blatant interference!