Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
Sorry, I didn't mean it to sound condescending. I just meant that finding a match meeting the fraud victim's standards would be very difficult (if not impossible). And I am not saying that she doesn't have the right to have those standards, but any male client they set her up with is going to have his own standards as well, and it is unlikely she would meet them. It's not just what she wants, but they need to consider what the other side wants. Multiply those together and the database probably came up empty. Obviously the company lied to her and should have refunded her money than make a lame attempt to lock her in to a contract.
Then Peanut's post sounded like a condemnation for men having the standards that they do, so some of us justified why those standards exist. If you make a condemnation on an opinion, it's reasonable to give a response.
|
Tall-ish, attractive, gainfully employed, presumably with a home address and good dental hygiene.
I'm still just not seeing how on earth this list can be considered very difficult to achieve. Literally nothing on her list of requests is outlandish. This is something that we keep harping on, how she's being unrealistic--these are barebones standards here, kids. She wasn't asking for a date with a male model who also happens to have a Nobel prize and also rescues puppies in his spare time when he's not feeding the homeless at a soup kitchen. She was asking for a date with a middle aged, reasonably attractive man with a job and a home address and all of his teeth.