Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnner
Have a friend with lightning season tickets and in his opinion Bishop had a poor year. An one off bad year or a warning sign of regression, he wasnt sure but he is glad they have Vasilevsky instead of Bishop long term. The key to a Bishop deal for Tre is term to limit the risk, has to be 3 years. Saturated goalie market may make it possible, higher AAV with short term? I know its early, but I think we have something in Parsons down the road.
|
Another thing is 2015-16 for Bishop was significantly better than 2014-15. Last season was not the norm for Bishop IMO, I don't think this year was either. I think the reality is somewhere in the middle, probably in the 915-920 SV% range being the norm.
I also agree on getting a goalie fro a shorter term, I don't want anyone for longer than 3 years.