Isn't all the talk about whether or not Wideman meant to do what he did kind of beside to point? I'm definitely not a lawyer, but I didn't think intent was necessary to establish civil liability. If I accidentally back my car into yours, am I not still liable for the damages?
I'm just tired reading the same rehashed arguments, especially when I'm not sure that the truth of his intent really matters here.
Of course, I could be dead wrong on all of this.
|