Quote:
Originally Posted by MelBridgeman
I thought when you review a goal, you are only confirming/invalidating the officials on ice call - which in this case was the puck did not cross the line before the whistle/net comes off. At that point anything else is not reviewable. Yet they come back with the goalie interference reason - even though they can only review the once ice call and not anything secondary.
|
Agreed. But they said after the fact the call on the ice was goaltender interference not no-goal because of losing sight of the puck or the net coming off.