Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaudfather
This is exactly why GG should have challenged the goalie interference call. It was not reviewable, as the officials had just reviewed it - but it was challengeable.
What represented a go ahead goal should have been challenged, even if you feel the probability of winning it is less than 50%.
Is the challenge reviewed by the NHL control room? And do they have access to this same overhead video? That really looks like a good goal.
|
He didn't challenge because the ref told him Toronto already reviewed it.. but what they didn't tell him is that they didn't review the goaltending interference they reviewed if the puck crossed the line with the net pegs still on the ice.