Quote:
Originally Posted by Infinit47
I'm fairly certain he said "the call on the ice was confirmed". But there was no call on the ice. Also, why do they automatically review goals against the Ducks for goalie interference. That's what the challenge is for.
For comparison, at that point goaltender interference was as reviewable as an offside would have been, which it to say it wasn't.
Very simple.
|
Did you read what I posted?
And yes there was a call on the ice of no goal..why do you think they were reviewing it to begin with?