Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
I honestly apologize, I didn't mean to make it as snarky as it clearly sounded. I didn't have time when I posted that, and if you look further I did expand on it. I deserved that. Again, I apologize.
Basically, if someone in Susan Rice's position needed to look at a piece of intel, she would do exactly what she did. This info would not have been shared to anyone without the highest classification, who could've ordered it themselves, unless there was something worth investigating.
The bigger question is not did she, as we've known only about 20 people in the country had the power to do it for months and she's one of them, it's why.
If it was political, why didn't they use it? If it was because they suspected something nefarious, isn't that what she's supposed to do?
I mean you'd have to be obtuse to be more upset that someone was looking into nefarious relationships than the the susbstance of those relationships, no???
This is simply nothing new except we have a face to the "one of twenty people"
|
Most of the info collected was political in nature. Like what the Trump team thought about foreign policy and who they may place in cabinet positions.
I am failing to see how any of this relates to national security.
Let me be clear, this does not justify Trump's idiotic tweets on March 4th, but Rice has some egg on her face and she has some explaining to do.