Quote:
Originally Posted by Frequitude
Why is CalgaryNEXT the best possible thing to go on the creosote area? It wouldn't generate any property tax.
If the city's going to pay for the clean up one way or another (like they are with CalgaryNEXT), wouldn't it be better to do so that actual property tax generating development could go on top?
edit: And regarding a fieldhouse, CalgaryNEXT gave the city partial use of a fieldhouse for $200M. How is that any better than 100% of a standalone fieldhouse for $200M.
|
Once again though that's fine.
If they don't think CalgaryNEXT is an efficient or desired anchor tenant for an area with a chemical issue than just say that.
Drop the 99.9999% of Calgarians, CalgaryNEXT is dead, but I want the Olympics BS that we are being fed weekly.