Quote:
Originally Posted by nik-
The only things the Flames were interested in a partner for was the bill, and a partner that ate the vast majority of the bill at that. They presented their take or or leave it vision and it was poor. Lets not pretend it's the City being unreasonable here.
|
Take it or leave it vision?
I think that's a terrible way to summarize their presentation to the city. I think Ken King mentioned the term "starting point", "dialogue", etc 100 times in a three months.
You don't have to like it, you don't have to think public money should be in it, but don't let those points sway you into painting everything with a negative brush.