View Single Post
Old 11-02-2006, 11:56 AM   #3
Fozzie_DeBear
Wucka Wocka Wacka
 
Fozzie_DeBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: East of the Rockies, West of the Rest
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mean Mr. Mustard View Post
1. That would do nothing to track concussions as the fource needed for a concussion is not static and furthermore concussions are monitored through CAT/MRI scans. Same thing with every injury.

2. Can tracking players not be done with I don't know videotape?

3. Heartrate? Why to determine what? I know that might sound rude but what would looking at a heartrate do in a game situation.

4. Don't cover ears in hockey reduced ambiant sound so one couldn't hear their teammate calling for a puck for instance.
Good points...and no they don't sound rude...if an idea is an ugly baby it is better to hear it early...but to clarify a few things

1-You can measure impact pretty easily with accelerometers...case in point airbags...and Virginia Tech is already doing this

2-Yep it sure can...the only difference here (and this is kinda egg-head stuff) is that you could track the positions of all players inside a computer system and then mine the data for interesting patterns (hey oil companies/financial companies mine data for interesting patterns all the time)

3-Honestly...I dunno

4-No loss of ambient noise would be tolerated, it would just be the same as a teammate shouting to you.
__________________
"WHAT HAVE WE EVER DONE TO DESERVE THIS??? WHAT IS WRONG WITH US????" -Oiler Fan

"It was a debacle of monumental proportions." -MacT

Last edited by Fozzie_DeBear; 11-02-2006 at 11:58 AM.
Fozzie_DeBear is offline   Reply With Quote