View Single Post
Old 03-21-2017, 02:04 PM   #56
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
Yeah, that was her.

She offered that while Stone has done a good job of stabilizing the second pair he should not be considered a long-term solution. Again, she sees him as a good #5–6 defensemen, but suggested that the Flames should pursue someone like Shattenkirk(!) to fill that #3–4 hole.

That is ridiculous.
Reminds me of the advanced stats guy Rob Kerr always brings on. Rob Vollman maybe?

Always acts like he is an expert of players he clearly doesn't watch. I remember him definitely saying Curtis Glencross had almost no trade value compared to the other names out there at the deadline 2 years ago, stating his advanced stats proved he would return a 4th or 5th round pick I believe.

Cut to the Glencross for 2nd and 3rd round picks trade.
AC is offline   Reply With Quote