Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob
I don't understand why this whole Granlund thing keeps coming up. It was a roster limit issue where the options were a) get an asset b) risk losing him for nothing c) keep him and use a roster spot on him which that probably means Versteeg or Tkachuk isn't here.
If anything Treliving learned from the Byron incident and chose a) because he knew he wouldn't go through waivers and he didn't want to be painted into a corner again.
Do people honestly think Granlund would make this current team better playing on the 4th line?
|
The issue is that they were playing bollig and jooris at the time. Granlund slots as center which was jammed choosing Stajan there instead. Kind of same thing as Byron.
I do think granlund on 4th line instead of stajan would be better and that is before considering the money and after considering the locker room.