You can read Jim's review here, since his site is getting a smackdown:
https://web.archive.org/web/20170312...e-wild-review/
While I agree with a few of the things he says, in no way do they take the game to a 7. That's just Jim trolling, as he is known to do. The content of the review is more measured in its explanations. I don't agree with the durability complaint, the enemies are too hard complainant, or the stamina is to small complaint. I think they all work well as game mechanics.
Anyway, this is just Jim being Jim, and the internet reacting as the internet does.