View Single Post
Old 03-09-2017, 10:33 AM   #31
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
So if I want to host a play in Banff where the antagonist is first nations, are they going to say I can't do that either?

In terms of social commentary on it's grounds, Parks Canada should only be bound by the law. If I'm at work or on a message board, I'm representing a larger entity to varying extents. This movie is not representing Parks Canada. Most likely it won't even have a mention of Parks Canada or anything related to it.
That's exactly what it's doing, and that's why they aren't allowing it.

Watch the credits of any movie filmed in a National Park. Go ahead.

I just think you're not actually looking at this from a basic, logical perspective and have immediately jumped to some outrage over a perceived social justice stance. Who are you representing by posting here? CP? Why? Because they simply gave you permission to post here? That's different than Parks Canada giving permission for a film to be made in a national park? Why?

If Parks Canada views your play as the sad attempt at proving a point, without any actual cultural substance or relevance that it definitely would be coming from polak, then yeah... they should definitely throw the "No" stamp on that bad boy. Sorry Shakespeare.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post: