Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed
Question for everyone:
Let's say the play was actually reviewed at the next whistle. Based or the replays, I believe that the result would have been deemed inconclusive.
Would people be more bitter about that play had it be reviewed and still called no goal?
|
This is my biggest gripe. With all of the technology in '04, they don't even have a conclusive replay to show whether it was in or not, so it's always up for debate.
They haven't done a heck of a lot to improve things since, while tennis has had great technology for the last 15 years or so. NHL seems to love keeping things controversial.