Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14
There was no indication that there was anything to review. If the Flames didn't think there was a cause to review and the referees didn't think there was a cause to review, then there was never going to be a review.
|
There was plenty indication that it was a reviewable play. The broadcasters only needed 1 replay to determine it required reviewing. How the league can be sitting in a room full of monitors, and not make a call to the arena to say "we have to review that play at the next whistle" is completely incompetent. That is what I have a problem with.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14
In hindsight, yes, we all wish that someone had realized there was a need.
|
So what are we arguing about then? That is essentially what I said in my original post:
"It just bugs the hell out of me though that they didn't do a proper review"
It sounds like you agree - you wish there would have been a review.