Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814
Not that the Rags would trade him, but just a hypothetical. What would you offer for Lundqvist?
He's 35 years old, and has four years left at $8.5. If the Rangers retained $2.5M, I would look long and hard at it.
|
Yikes. Let's not help the Rangers relieve themselves out of another an anchor of a contract. Lundqvist has return to a bit of form since struggling a little earlier but paying $6M for an aging goalie who's less likely to put in consistent stretches of elite or even good play is not a smart investment. Bishop at 6v6 is probably a better idea if you were forced to spend big on a goalie.