Quote:
Originally Posted by cam_wmh
While he doesn't specifically have names, he has insider information? Read that aloud, it makes no sense.
Can you give us a screen print of the FB post, and edit out identifying names?
|
I'm not really going to to respond to any individual posts, outside of this one. Not sure what you're trying to say here cam. That I fabricated this conversation? It's literally copy/pasted from my FB feed. And sure, it is possible to have insider information without having names.
This thread has derailed from what my intention was, which is partly my fault as I should not have posted "Joe's" comments. I should have known they would have been dissected, especially seeing as there are a couple lawyers in here doing so. And to be fair, his comments are certainly dissectable, as he did come across as rash. My intent was to relay the fact that there are whispers within the force that some or all of these complainants may be taking advantage of the system. I should have said that, and left it at that. Instead this has derailed into his comment being picked apart, saying he is part of the problem. Again, which I kind of understand given the context, but what I can tell you about "Joe", is that I know for a fact he is not a part of the problem with his actions, as I have known him for 20+ years and know the type of character he is. Whether that's believed in here doesn't really matter to me.
And MBates - that's horrible what your client went through, and knowing Joe, he would agree.
