Quote:
Originally Posted by MillerTime GFG
MBates - remember those are not my words, so there's no need to throw the "food for thought" back at me in a condescending way as it seems you are. It's more to open up the dialogue, for as you can see from other posters in here, it's not just Joe that has voiced these concerns about these people coming forward.
Admittedly Joe does come across as saying all of the complainants are full of you know what, but in his defense, he does say "that most or all of these people are #### pumps."
|
I guess the point I was trying to make is that it really is not food for thought and it is actually counter-productive to present it as such.
Joe claims to have inside information but says he guarantees his view of the complaints is correct without even knowing the names of the people that are complaining.
There is no food to eat (or think about) there.
I readily accept some complainants might just trying to make up for the fact they are sub-standard police officers. That should 100% be scrutinized just like false complaints should always be guarded against.
He could have said that.