Quote:
Originally Posted by 4X4
Maybe the lawyers that defend a a man so obviously guilty that they cannot even concoct a defense, and then proceed to claim his innocence in their closing arguments, and the proceed to F up the victim impact statements with a bunch of irrelevant BS, need to just re-examine their purpose.
This isn't a car theft. This isn't bank robbery. This is premeditated murder that involved about a quarter of a family, and a five year old boy.
I appreciate your stoic replies, and your deeply informative responses, but this is not a drug deal gone wrong, this is a 5 year old boy getting tortured and murdered by a psycho bastard that hated his grandpa.
As badly as I need to take my emotion out of it, I think you need to put your emotion into it to understand why these lawyers lost all my respect by dragging this out even longer with the impact statement objections.
|
Sigh...
You are more than entitled to your view. I suspect the lawyers will place more weight on the view of the trial judge who they did all of their work in front of for the last 5 weeks, including the application to edit the victim impact statements.
The judge, who of course used to be a lawyer, gained respect for them such that he classes them in the group of the best that the profession can aspire to be.
You have lost all respect for them.
I side with the judge on this one.
Will it help me if I type it with more passion?