Quote:
Originally Posted by 4X4
Maybe the lawyers that defend a a man so obviously guilty that they cannot even concoct a defense, and then proceed to claim his innocence in their closing arguments, and the proceed to F up the victim impact statements with a bunch of irrelevant BS, need to just re-examine their purpose.
This isn't a car theft. This isn't bank robbery. This is premeditated murder that involved about a quarter of a family, and a five year old boy.
I appreciate your stoic replies, and your deeply informative responses, but this is not a drug deal gone wrong, this is a 5 year old boy getting tortured and murdered by a psycho bastard that hated his grandpa.
As badly as I need to take my emotion out of it, I think you need to put your emotion into it to understand why these lawyers lost all my respect by dragging this out even longer with the impact statement objections.
|
They probably did the family a favour by not allowing submissions to be read that could call into question bias in sentencing.
Everyone wanted this to be over. Trust the professionals to do their job.