When you start defining what is and isn't free speech beyond the concept of hateful harm producing dialogue your really eroding one of the main platforms of a free society.
Free speech should literally only be limited by crossing that line into creating genuine physical harm.
It should be ok to say absolutely that Sharia Law is a repulsive form of law due to its treatment of woman.
However it's completely different if you say "Sharia Law is coming unless we kill all Muslims"
I really don't see a need for this motion, to me its just political grandstanding and score keeping.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|